EFSET vs. Tracktest:
Which English Proficiency Test Is Right for You?
English proficiency is a key asset in education, employment, and global communication. As digital language testing grows in popularity, two widely used online platforms stand out: EFSET and Tracktest English Assessment.
While EFSET is known for its accessibility and free model, Tracktest offers a more robust, professionally oriented solution. This article compares both tools (other high-stakes English exams are compared here).
EFSET: A Solid Free Option for Self-Assessment
EFSET (EF Standard English Test), developed by Education First, is a free online test focused on receptive skills—reading and listening. It’s ideal for individuals who want a quick overview of their English level without cost or complexity.
Key Features of EFSET:
- 100% free and self-paced
- Offers short (15-minute) and full (50-minute/2-hour) versions
- Instant CEFR-level results
- Downloadable certificate (PDF)
- Great for inclusion in LinkedIn profiles or CVs
However, it does not test speaking or writing, which limits its usefulness for roles or applications where communication skills are essential.
Tracktest: A Comprehensive, Professional-Grade English Assessment
Tracktest is designed with professional and institutional users in mind. Unlike many free tests, it evaluates all four core language skills: reading, listening, writing, and speaking—making it ideal for companies, schools, and serious learners.
Key Advantages of Tracktest:
- Full-Skills Coverage
Tracktest assesses productive skills (writing and speaking) in addition to reading and listening. This makes it a complete language proficiency evaluation—critical for workplaces, academic programs, or immigration purposes. - Human-Assessed Speaking & Writing
Unlike fully automated systems, Tracktest uses real examiners to evaluate open-ended responses. This leads to more accurate and trustworthy results, especially for speaking fluency, grammar, and writing coherence. - CEFR-Aligned & Globally Recognized
Results are mapped to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), from A1 to C2. Many organizations worldwide accept CEFR levels as a benchmark for recruitment, admissions, and employee training. - Verifiable Certification
Every candidate receives a secure, verifiable certificate that includes a QR code or unique ID for authentication. Employers and institutions can easily confirm results, reducing concerns over resume fraud or unverifiable claims. - Flexible and Scalable for Organizations
Tracktest offers corporate and academic solutions, including bulk testing, group reporting, and tracking learner progress over time. It’s a go-to platform for HR departments, universities, and language schools.
Comparison Table: EFSET vs. Tracktest
| Feature | Tracktest | EFSET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Paid (varies by package; institutional pricing) | Free |
| Skills Assessed | Reading, Listening, Speaking, Writing | Reading, Listening |
| Certification | Verifiable certificate with unique ID | Basic PDF certificate |
| Test Supervision | Optional proctoring; human-assessed components | Self-administered |
| Purpose | Professional, academic, HR, training, immigration | Self-assessment, CV, LinkedIn |
| Customization | Modular (add skills as needed); group testing tools | Standardized one-size-fits-all test |
Who Should Use Tracktest?
Tracktest is the ideal solution for:
- Companies that need scalable English testing for recruitment or staff evaluation
- Educational institutions assessing students’ progress or placement
- Job seekers applying for roles that require verified English fluency
- Immigration applicants needing certified language results
- Individuals preparing for international study or work opportunities
Conclusion
While EFSET offers an excellent starting point for learners looking to gauge their English level at no cost, Tracktest stands out as the superior option for professional, academic, and organizational use.
With its comprehensive skill coverage, human-graded components, and verifiable certification, Tracktest delivers the depth and reliability that serious English learners and evaluators require.